Bush Turns Blind Eye to Blackout Culprit: FirstEnergy Raised Thousands for Bush Campaign
By Tyson Slocum / Special to CorpWatch

The Great Blackout's Great Coincidence
By Cheryl Seal / IndyMedia

September 12, 2003

Bush Turns Blind Eye to Blackout Culprit: FirstEnergy Raised Thousands for Bush Campaign
Tyson Slocum / Special to CorpWatch

FirstEnergy CEO H. Peter Berg has been a major campaign contributor to George W. Bush.
(August 21, 2003) -- An Ohio-based energy conglomerate has been identified as responsible for the massive power blackout that shut down much of the Midwest and Northeast -- but the Bush administration isn't taking notice. FirstEnergy's strong ties to the president may help explain why the company may be let off the hook for depriving millions of power during the blackout.

Top executives at FirstEnergy rank among the Bush campaign's top fundraisers. FirstEnergy President Anthony Alexander was a Bush Pioneer in 2000 -- meaning he raised at least $100,000 -- and then served on the Energy Department transition team. H. Peter Burg, the company's CEO and chairman of the board, hosted a June event that raised more than half a million dollars for Bush-Cheney '04.

FirstEnergy at Fault
The immediate cause of the largest blackout in US history is being traced to FirstEnergy, the Akron, Ohio, energy giant that is a product of the merger of seven utilities: Toledo Edison, Cleveland Electric, Ohio Edison, Pennsylvania Power, Pennsylvania Electric, Metropolitan Edison and Jersey Central Power & Light.

On Aug. 14, FirstEnergy's 550-megawatt, coal-fired Eastlake power plant in Ohio stopped running at 2 p.m. In response, FirstEnergy began to pull roughly 20 percent of its load of electricity out of Michigan to meet its needs. This transfer overloaded several transmission lines, causing them to trip. Non-FirstEnergy plants in Ontario, Canada, began supplying energy to the underpowered Michigan market, which then led to overload on those transmission lines. This movement of power in Canada deprived New York of power it had relied on, which led to the blackouts there.

Why Bush Won't Blame FirstEnergy
Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham, discussing the administration's plans for addressing the blackout, told CBS's Face the Nation that consumers should be responsible for paying the $50 billion he claims is needed to upgrade the transmission system. Abraham added: "Rate-payers, obviously, will pay the bill because they're the ones who benefit."

Missing from the Bush administration's solution is corporate America's culpability. Since FirstEnergy started the problem, why shouldn't the company be held responsible?

The reason FirstEnergy may be getting a free pass is because the company enjoys a close relationship with President Bush. On June 30, FirstEnergy CEO and Chairman of the Board H. Peter Burg hosted a fundraiser with Vice President Dick Cheney near the company's headquarters that raised $600,000 for the Bush-Cheney re-election campaign. Held at the Hilton in Akron's upscale Fairlawn neighborhood, attendees ponied up $1,000 to eat shrimp and hear Cheney speak. For an additional $1,000, they could get their picture taken with the vice president.

Anthony J. Alexander, FirstEnergy's president and chief operating officer, is a 2000 Pioneer - meaning he raised at least $100,000 for the Bush-Cheney campaign. He was also part of the Republican National Committee's Team 100, raising $250,000 for the GOP in 2000. Alexander personally gave another $100,000 to fund Bush-Cheney inauguration festivities. When Bush took office, Alexander was included on the Energy Department's transition team.

FirstEnergy's PAC and its top executives are the sixth-largest contributors from the electric utility industry, giving more than $1 million to federal candidates in 2001-2002 alone, with 70 percent of the money going to Republicans. The company gave an additional $168,000 to Ohio state candidates over the same period (with three-quarters going to Republicans).

FirstEnergy wields enormous lobbying influence in Congress as well. The company spent nearly $3.8 million lobbying Congress and the Bush administration in 2001-2002 alone.

FirstEnergy's Woes
Triggering the blackout is only the latest of FirstEnergy's struggles. In early August, FirstEnergy announced it had to lower its profits from 2000-2002 and the first quarter of 2003. The financial restatement reduced earnings per share by nearly 11 percent in 2002 alone. In addition, the restatement will result in lower earnings through 2005. The accounting problems stem from permissive policies by FirstEnergy's longtime accountant, Arthur Andersen. In response, a class action lawsuit has been filed by Milberg Weiss, accusing FirstEnergy of using "accounting improprieties" by inflating its profits.

FirstEnergy also has been cited for negligent management of the company's Davis-Besse nuclear reactor, located at the west end of Lake Erie, near Toledo, Ohio. The commercial power reactor remains shut down to this day, adding no power to the grid but remaining a constant risk to the surrounding region as another potential accident or terrorist target.

In 2001, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission inspected some of the nation's 69 Pressurized Water Reactors (PWRs), of which Davis-Besse is one. FirstEnergy successfully pushed the NRC for a postponement of inspections at Davis-Besse until mid-February 2002. That March, workers repairing a cracked mechanism at the top of the reactor discovered a football-sized cavity where boric acid had corroded through the reactor head. The corrosion was the result of the cracking and leaking that have been found in many of the PWR nuclear reactors (and was the reason why the NRC wanted to inspect all of the PWRs). Had the boric acid eaten through a final half-inch of metal, a loss-of-coolant would have occurred-creating the kind of incident that could lead to a meltdown of the reactor.

Since the discovery, the plant has remained shuttered, and FirstEnergy admitted in a report to the NRC that it had prioritized electricity "production over safety." The NRC's evaluation of FirstEnergy indicated a "lack of safety culture" at the company.

FirstEnergy, Deregulation and the Bush Administration
FirstEnergy may have been the spur of the power outage, but deregulation deserves the overall blame. The Bush administration pursued a policy of energy deregulation long before the August blackout, and now that policy has come back to haunt us.

Bush's energy deregulation is making America vulnerable for two reasons. First, America's transmission system was designed to accommodate local electricity markets, not the large, freewheeling trading of electricity and movement of power over long distances under deregulation. Sending power over a much wider area strains a transmission system designed to serve local utilities. That's why state regulators in the Midwest warned FirstEnergy and other utilities months ago that the transmission network was vulnerable to a blackout. But these concerns were ignored by these energy corporations.

Second, state-based deregulation means utilities are no longer required to reinvest ratepayer money back into the transmission system, as deregulation replaced that orderly planning with reliance on "the market." But the market has been unwilling to make the necessary investments in transmission. In particular, the market has not functioned properly as loopholes were punched in the Public Utility Holding Company Act (PUHCA) over the past decade.

PUHCA, slated for full repeal by the Republicans in both the House and Senate energy bills, is the last federal regulation that requires giant energy companies to disclose crucial financial details and limits the types of non-electricity investments they may make. If PUHCA is repealed, a wave of mergers will likely result, leaving a handful of companies (like Southern Co., ExxonMobil and FirstEnergy) in control of our electricity - with no effective regulators looking over their shoulders.

In the case of the August blackouts, the deregulated wholesale markets of the Midwest and Northeast -- typically cited as models for national deregulation by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission -- failed in their ability to provide reliable and affordable power. As a result, wholesale prices remain higher than under regulation, and nearly 96 percent of the 40 million residential consumers in the remaining 15 deregulated states lack access to competitive electricity suppliers.

This is the world of energy the Bush administration and its financial supporters envisioned. Of course, no one wanted a regional blackout. But no one was there to prevent it, either.

Can Bush Administration Investigation of Energy Company Wrongdoing be Trusted?
Spencer Abraham announced this week that the Department of Energy would take the lead on investigating the cause of the blackout. This is the same Bush Administration that, two years after the fact, has yet to charge Enron's Ken Lay or Jeff Skilling with a single crime or freeze a penny of assets for their role in helping to steal $70 billion from California consumers.

Since FirstEnergy's top brass is as financially connected to Bush as Enron ever was, the public needs proof that the Administration can undertake an impartial investigation. That's why Public Citizen is asking that Vice-President Cheney release all documents relating to his 2001 energy task force so the American people can be sure that the Secretary of Energy and other Bush Administration officials are not compromised during the course of their investigation.

NHNE News, PO Box 2242 Sedona, AZ 86339.

The Great Blackout's Great Coincidence
By Cheryl Seal / IndyMedia

The CEO of the firm responsible for the largest blackout in US history deserves some credit from the environmental community ‹ look at all the energy waste he prevented. ©FirstEnergy
(August 17, 2003) -- The timing of the August blackout was amazingly coincidental. It occurred just weeks before Bush plans to shove a sweeping energy plan through Congress. Bush's energy plan will not only force America to be more dependent on fossil fuel for decades to come, but will turn the American electrical utility system into a giant megacorporation sans competition, sans recourse by consumers.

The blackout also occurred just as Bush's alternative to the Clean Air Act, the Clear Skies Initiative, was facing a very uncertain future. The Clear Skies scheme would give the electrical power industry a license to pollute.

According to David Doniger of the Natural Resources Defense Council, Clear Skies will allow power plant carbon emissions (the top greenhouse gas) to increase by up to 16 percent between 2000 and 2010 -- and this at a time when the ravages of global warming are becoming alarmingly obvious and air pollution related asthma among children has been steadily climbing.

Here's how the New York Times put it in their August 15 edition: "The focus of the energy bill has been on a controversial plan from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to rewrite power grid rules and require US utilities to join super-regional grid groups...The industry needs about $50 billion to $100 billion in new investment."

This would mean the construction of an unbelievably massive, ugly network of giant new power lines. Millions of acres of land could be claimed by the federal government as "public domain."

What truly shows the Bush lie in his quest for new power plants is that there is NO POWER SHORTAGE. There is in fact a SURPLUS of power in the US. It is just the distribution system needs an overhaul. In fact, when the Farr Amendment was introduced in 2001, calling for funds to be devoted to real grid upgrades, guess who killed it? Yep: Bush & Co.

What is truly ironic is that the power failure occurred in the area where the power industry had been most deregulated -- in the Mid-Atlantic!

Was the Blackout Orchestrated?
Three minutes into his statement on the night of August 14, Bush was calling for 'upgrades.' After a major disaster, most leaders don't bring that sort of thing up as their first issue. The human element comes first.

Bush failed to cancel his fund-raising dinner for [GOP California Gubernatorial candidate] Arnold Schwartzenegger and come back East. This action suggestsÂ… that he knew that the power outage would be a short-lived, non-catastrophic event.

The New York grid has a very sophisticated system for responding to failures at any given point in the system to prevent any cascade effect. Through the night of August 14-15 power experts were weighing in on the blackout on radio talk shows and Internet postings. It shouldn't have happened, they said -- not with the 'checks and balances' built into that system. Yes, a 'point blackout' could have happened, but a massive cascade? Something is fishy here. Such has been the repeated assessment.

[One] scenario is that someone caused the cascade simply by failing to follow the rules -- intentionally or unintentionally. As one engineer put it during an interview on August 15, in the deregulated system, the rules are now 'suggested' rather than mandatory. Even if caught, the guilty party would not be technically culpable.

Edited from a longer article that may be viewed at:

Also see this article by Greg Palast: "Power Outage Traced to Dim Bulb in White House: The Tale of the Brits who Swiped 800 jobs from New York, Carted off $90 Million, then Turned Off our Lights."

For more information contact:

Home | Background | News | Links | Donate | Contact Us |

(510) THE-EDGE (843-3343)
E-mail us at gar.smith@earthlink.net